Richard Devine, partner at Houston-headquartered law firm Baker Botts, talks to TOGY about Iraq’s contractual arrangements and the limitations of the present economic environment. Devine goes on to discuss the recent movements in the Iraqi market, affected by the financial distress caused by the ongoing fluctuation in oil prices and evolving security landscape.
What effect has increasing scrutiny on technical services contracts (TSCs) had in Iraq?
TSCs have certainly been stress-tested by the falling oil prices. Most contracts were entered into prior to the glut of oil supply the market faces today.
The oil price was high then and it was assumed that the price would stay high. Indeed, one of the drivers for the government in using the TSC model was to prevent international oil companies (IOCs) from enjoying a windfall profits bonanza from high oil prices.
The means by which TSCs prevent the IOCs from enjoying the upside of rising oil prices is a fixed-price per barrel service fee that is payable on achieving and sustaining a production target.
Under these contracts, oil companies do not benefit if the oil price increases. However, the same mechanism ensures that IOCs are insulated from the impact of low oil prices to a degree, because they are paid the same service fee regardless of the prevailing oil price.
Low prices are doubly bad for the government. They will receive a lower proportion of the oil produced under the TSCs and will then have to sell it at a lower price.
Iraq’s reliance on oil revenues means that the government’s budget is badly affected by a low oil price and this comes at a time when it has to spend much more on defence as a result of the security situation.
Naturally, this will create tensions. As a consequence, we understand that the government is already requiring certain projects to be delayed or cancelled.
If the low oil price environment continues, there may be pressure to renegotiate contracts and the cancellation or postponement of investments may affect production in future.
Under normal circumstances, what would be the incentive for IOCs to try and move away from technical services contracts?
The drive to use TSCs came from the government. IOCs are typically more comfortable with the production-sharing contract model and other models that provide them with more operational control and greater rewards for success.
Depending on the terms being offered, it is likely that IOCs would be interested in moving away from TSCs to a production-sharing contract model.
The difficulty in current circumstances is that the government cannot afford to reduce its take from oil contracts and there is little incentive for the IOCs to do more for less. One potential way forward may relate to exploration acreage.
Iraq used a TSC model for exploration blocks in its fourth licensing round. The fact that a number of IOCs elected not to bid on the round suggests that the TSC model does not offer sufficiently appealing rewards to encourage investment in exploration.
The government might consider offering access to exploration opportunities on more attractive terms, and could try to make such access conditional on IOCs accepting changes to TSC terms relating to existing production.
TOGY talks to Sylvain Itté, French Ambassador to Angola, about the strong economic and cultural ties between the two countries,… Read More
TOGY talks to Li Patrik, director of energy, environment, infrastructure at the China-Britain Business Council (CBBC), about the difficulties of… Read More
TOGY talks to Río Negro province Secretary of Hydrocarbons Sebastian Caldiero about policies implemented by the provincial government to manage… Read More
TOGY talks to Heba Filobbos, area manager of the Northern Gulf for Halliburton, about the company’s experience working as an… Read More
TOGY talks to Christopher Gunson, partner at Amereller, about the oil and gas industry in the UAE and the surrounding… Read More
TOGY talks to Graeme Taylor, Vice President for Angola at Halliburton, about forecasted stabilisation, onshore potential and the qualities required… Read More
This website uses cookies.